Re: pg_xlog safety
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_xlog safety |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030127181228.B9007@mail.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_xlog safety (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_xlog safety
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:26:15PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > If you raid has battery-backed RAM cach in your controller, there is no > advantage to putting WAL on a separate disk --- was that the case? That was always my view, as well. But someone presented me with an argument that it would somehow be better to use separate disks inside the array in order to make this faster (i.e. it'd still be faster because there'd be no contention for spindles). So, I tried it, but I could see no difference no matter what I did. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: