Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200301260527.h0Q5RiU22818@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Agreed. How do we get the patches in there, or are they there already? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > So, do we have non-security fixes to warrant a 7.2.X? > > There's the order-of-operations-in-checkpoint problem, and there's > one variant of the "no one parent tuple was found" problem that > should have been patched in 7.2.3, but was overlooked. > > Also, the bogus-datetime-table-ordering bugs appear to exist in > 7.2 (cf. recent complaint about timezone ART not being recognized). > That ought to be back-patched, if we're going to make a 7.2.4, > though one could certainly say that that doesn't merit a release > by itself. > > I think there's enough to warrant a 7.2.4 ... > > regards, tom lane > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: