Re: Mount options for Ext3?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mount options for Ext3? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200301241822.33731.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mount options for Ext3? (Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Mount options for Ext3?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Kevin, > So if I'm right about that, then you might consider using the > "data=writeback" option for the filesystem that contains the actual > data (usually /usr/local/pgsql/data), but I'd use the default > ("data=ordered") at the very least (I suppose there's no harm in using > "data=journal" if you're willing to put up with the performance hit, > but it's not clear to me what benefit, if any, there is) for > everything else. Well, the only reason I use Ext3 rather than Ext2 is to prevent fsck's on restart after a crash. So I'm interested in the data option that gives the minimum performance hit, even if it means that I sacrifice some reliability. I'm running with fsynch on, and the DB is on a mirrored drive array, so I'm not too worried about filesystem-level errors. So would that be "data=writeback"? -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: