Re: 'cgi-version' of pgsql
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 'cgi-version' of pgsql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200301142003.29032.dev@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 'cgi-version' of pgsql (Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 14 Jan 2003 7:24 pm, Dennis Gearon wrote: > I would like to start using PGSQL. I'm developing an app that I want to > maintain referential integrity, blah blah. So OUT with MySQL, in with > PGSQL. > > However, I am on a hosted server who does NOT have PGSL. I'd like to stay > with them, but I may not do so. > > **IF** I do stay with them, I'd like to run a 'cgi-version' if PGSQL if > it's possible and not to bad to do. A description of this would be: > > 1/ single user only > 2/ static linked > 3/ binary available for Intel machine > 4/ would reside in something like > /home/account-name/pgsql > > Am I way off base? Afraid so - Postgresql is designed to have the backend running constantly. The startup times would be crippling for a single-process CGI. I believe there's a partial list of webhosters supporting PG on the techdocs.postgresql.org website, but google is probably just as quick a solution. -- Richard Huxton
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: