Re: Sun vs. Mac - best Postgres platform?
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sun vs. Mac - best Postgres platform? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030114133046.T5335@mail.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sun vs. Mac - best Postgres platform? (CaptainX0r <captainx0r@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sun vs. Mac - best Postgres platform?
Re: Sun vs. Mac - best Postgres platform? |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:10:54AM -0800, CaptainX0r wrote: > > could you post your $PGDATA/postgresql.conf for our viewing > > pleasure ? > > max_connections = 64 > shared_buffers = 65536 # 1/2 total RAM /8K > sort_mem = 100000 # min 64, size in KB ^^^^^^ There's your problem. Don't set that anywhere near that high. If you run 2 queries that require sorting, _each sort_ can use up to 100000 K. Which can chew up all your memory pretty fast. > effective_cache_size = 65536 # typically 8KB each What basis did you have to change this? Have you done work figuring out how big the kernel's disk cache is regularly on that system? > Hannu brings up a good point - one that was debated before my > attempts at making Solaris faster. If you were going to make a > fast postgres server what would you use? Assuming you could > afford a SunFire 280R (~$8k?), would that money be better spent > on a (say) Dell server running (say) linux? We're doing light I've been finding FreeBSD way faster than Linux. But yes. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: