Re: Question about bit.h and bit.c

Files removed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> 
>     Tom> Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh@cs.berkeley.edu> writes:
>     >> Why is it that bit.h is in src/include/utils and bit.c is in
>     >> src/backend/lib ?
> 
>     Tom> Possibly a more interesting question is why haven't we
>     Tom> ditched them both ... AFAICT none of the bit.c routines are
>     Tom> used anymore.
> 
> True. I just searched and found the only uses of the bitmask functions
> (now greatly expanded) in our code :-)
> 
> -- 
> Pip-pip
> Sailesh
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073