Re: MOVE LAST: why?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MOVE LAST: why? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200301072329.h07NT2X28922@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | MOVE LAST: why? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: MOVE LAST: why?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > 2002-11-12 19:44 momjian > > > > * doc/src/sgml/ref/move.sgml, src/backend/commands/portalcmds.c, > > src/backend/executor/execMain.c, src/backend/parser/gram.y, > > src/backend/parser/keywords.c, src/backend/tcop/utility.c, > > src/include/commands/portalcmds.h, src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h: > > Make MOVE/FETCH 0 actually move/fetch 0. Add MOVE LAST to move to > > end of cursor. > > Refresh my memory: what is the point of inventing an additional LAST > keyword, when the behavior is exactly the same as MOVE ALL ? SQL compatibility, per Peter. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: