Re: OS/400 support?
От | cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OS/400 support? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030107015232.4500449307@cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OS/400 support? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: OS/400 support?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) transmitted: > Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes: >> We don't support OS/400 yet do we? > > Never heard of it. Is it Unix-y? Do you have one available for testing? No, OS/400 is what replaced IBM System 34, System 36, and System 38. (Apparently they jumped to 40, and then multiplied by 10 to suggest it was 10x as good...) It was based on the CMU "Hydra" project, which built an OS with a pretty strong security kernel, with ties to the "orthogonal persistence" notion. By this point, they have created a POSIX-emulation environment so it can pretend to be somewhat like a Unix, but underneath, it's a database system for running RPG code. As such, it kind of starts as a DBMS. Somehow, I'm not sure that PostgreSQL-on-OS/400 is likely to be more than a curiosity. -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc@" "enworbbc")) http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/rdbms.html If you can't see the bright side of things, polish the dark side...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: