Re: RI Constraint display
От | elein |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RI Constraint display |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200212282309.gBSN9DkD677204@pimout3-ext.prodigy.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RI Constraint display (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: RI Constraint display
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Then this is a distinction between the trigger name and the constraint name? The trigger name is RI_ConstraintTrigger_437278 (or some such oid). The trigger is the implementation of the constraint so the trigger name is what I had expected to see. Almost all of the system generated names, sequences, triggers, etc, have constructed names. $n for constrain names seems like an anomaly. elein On Thursday 26 December 2002 13:45, Tom Lane wrote: > elein <elein@sbcglobal.net> writes: > > Referential integrity constraints are displayed as $n. > > If you didn't assign a name to the constraint, that's what the generated > names look like. Try "CONSTRAINT foo FOREIGN KEY ...". > > regards, tom lane -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- elein@varlena.com Database Consulting www.varlena.com I have always depended on the [QA] of strangers.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: