Re: RedHat attitude
От | Jean-Michel POURE |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RedHat attitude |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200212161217.17869.jm.poure@freesurf.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RedHat attitude (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: RedHat attitude
Re: RedHat attitude |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Le Lundi 16 Décembre 2002 10:44, Gavin Sherry a écrit : > LETS GET ON WITH THE JOB. Your opinion is that RedHat will not close RedHat database souces. On the converse, I think they will. Please consider RedHat 8.0 software installer, KDE 3.0 fork, etc... These are obvious moves towards reducing access to source code. RedHat wants to please the financial community and is driving away from its roots. Sorry Gavin, I have some business experience founding several companies. My companies are still alive. I have a huge respect for PostgreSQL hackers work and skills. Here is the opinion of a 32 year-old guy who got screewed several times before he actually understood the power of greed in business : MAKE SURE TO SETTLE PROBLEMS BEFORE THEY ACTUALLY ARRIVE. To avoid PostgreSQL image being broken in the future, some PostgreSQL new developements should be released under ***activist*** licenses comparable to pgAdmin license. It would be a win-win situation : - RedHat benefits from PostgreSQL software whever they keep PostgreSQL name, - PostgreSQL group benefits from RedHat support as regards employment. I see no conflict. Otherwize, a conflict may appear whenever PostgreSQL becomes really successfull. In business, this is usually the case : everything is OK when you don't earn money, people fight when money is at stake. Cheers, Jean-Michel POURE
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: