Re: Big 7.4 items
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Big 7.4 items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200212132119.gBDLJWf07970@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Big 7.4 items (<darren@up.hrcoxmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
darren@up.hrcoxmail.com wrote: > > It is asynchronous without the need of 2 phase commit. It is group > > communication based and requires the group communication system to > > guarantee total order. The tricky part is, that the local transaction > > must be on hold until the own commit message comes back without a prior > > No, It holds until it's own Writeset comes back. Commits > and then send a commit message on the simple channel, so > commits don't wait for ordered writesets. Darren, can you clarify this? Why does it send that message? How does it allow commits not to wait for ordered writesets? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: