Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for DBD::Pg pg_relcheck problem

Added to TODO.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Greg Copeland wrote:
> Perhaps compression should be added to the list of protocol changes. 
> This way, we can allow for per packet evaluation for compression.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net>
> Copeland Computer Consulting
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 21:50, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net> writes:
> > > > Sounds good to me. Is it on the todo-list? (Couldn't see it there).
> > > 
> > > Probably not; Bruce for some reason has resisted listing protocol change
> > > desires as an identifiable TODO category.  There are a couple of threads
> > > in the pghackers archives over the last year or so that discuss the
> > > different things we want to do, though.  (Improving the error-reporting
> > > framework and fixing the COPY protocol are a couple of biggies I can
> > > recall offhand.)
> > 
> > Listing protocol changes seemed too low-level for the TODO list, but I
> > have kept the email messages.  Today I updated the TODO list and added a
> > section for them.
> 
> 
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073