Re: more compile warnings
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: more compile warnings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200212091842.gB9IgNQ15505@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: more compile warnings (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > You would think that would catch it. My problem is that I am compiling > > with -O0, because I compile all day and I don't care about optimization. > > You should reconsider that. At -O0 gcc doesn't do any flow analysis, > and thus you lose many important warnings. I'd recommend -O1 at least. Yes, I will re-add -O to my flags. When I did it I forgot it would affect warnings. In fact, I am now seeing a similar warning in python that I hadn't seen before, and others probably don't see it because they don't compile python. FYI, -O2 adds only 2 minutes to my 13 minute test script (but increases the cpu usage from 4 to 6 minutes). -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: