Re: nested transactions
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: nested transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200211290553.gAT5rQP20616@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: nested transactions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: nested transactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > It only becomes better if we can throw away that file (or contents) when > > the transaction completes and we have marked all the subtransactions as > > completed. We can't compress pg_clog if we store the parent info in > > there. > > But we already have a recycling mechanism for pg_clog. AFAICS, > creating a parallel log file with a separate recycling mechanism is > a study in wasted effort. But that recycling requires the vacuum of every database in the system. Do people do that frequently enough? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: