Re: Rép
От | Bruno Wolff III |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rép |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20021127122448.GA12176@wolff.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Rép. : Mailing list question ("Erwan DUROSELLE" <EDuroselle@seafrance.fr>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:28:29 +0100, Erwan DUROSELLE <EDuroselle@seafrance.fr> wrote: > I have the same problem. > AFAIK, this is not the usual behaviour for mailing lists. It depends on what lists you use. Technical mailing lists are often set up without munging reply-to headers. You can use a mail-followup-to header to tell mail clients where followups should be sent. This header is not supported by all mail clients, so it isn't always going to work. Mutt has a reply to list function. Russel Nelson is advocating that mail client implementors provide a reply to recipients function, but I don't know that anyone has yet. Personally, I think the disadvantages of reply-to munging outweigh its advantages.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: