Re: [PORTS] Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: RC1?)
От | Patrick Welche |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PORTS] Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: RC1?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20021120175753.G25210@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PORTS] Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: RC1?) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PORTS] Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: RC1?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 06:48:15PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > > AFAIK, all modern hardware claims compliance to the IEEE floating-point > > arithmetic standard, so failure to print minus zero as minus zero is > > very likely to be a software issue not hardware. That suggests strongly > > that the issue is netbsd version (specifically libc version) and not the > > hardware platform. > > I could confirm my initial suspicion: it's a *printf() library issue. The > FreeBSD CVS log tells the tale: > > http://www.de.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c > > The next FreeBSD subrelease (4.8?) should have this fixed. OpenBSD is not > fixed. NetBSD and Darwin seem to have temporarily hidden their cvsweb in > shame, but I would assume it's the same issue. Not sure what HP-UX is > doing about it. Right, the equivalent for NetBSD vfprintf.c is: revision 1.40 date: 2001/11/28 11:58:22; author: kleink; state: Exp; lines: +4 -4 Since we're returned the sign of a floating-point number by __dtoa(), use that to decide whether to include a minus sign in the result. Fixes printing -0.0, and thus PR lib/3137. NetBSD 1.5 has revision 1.32, NetBSD 1.6 has revision 1.42 Well spotted, Patrick
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: