Re: CLUSTER ALL patch

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Oh, hold, I now see that clusterdb _can_ do all databases, just like
> > vacuumdb.  Seems we should keep it.  Peter?
>
> Interesting.  Do we recommend that users routine recluster all their
> databases?
>
> Perhaps we need a more general client-side tool to run some command on all
> databases, so we could get rid of clusterdb, vacuumdb, reindexdb,
> mycommandofthedaydb, etc.

Yes, I think that makes sense.  I think we need to keep clusterdb
_until_ we get a more general solution.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073