Re: PG Collaborative structure is ready for initial
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG Collaborative structure is ready for initial |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200211111503.43094.dev@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG Collaborative structure is ready for initial (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Monday 11 Nov 2002 1:58 pm, Justin Clift wrote: > Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > <snip> > > > Had a shot at it for disk tuning guide. Looks good to me. Let's bring it > > in production but we need to have authentication in place otherwise > > people will fill it with junk( in worst case that is..) > > The present dilemma is that the PostgreSQL users database that we > presently use for registering people on the Techdocs site isn't yet tied > to the Zope authentication scheme. > > It's easy to manually create users in Zope and restrict the editing or > creation of pages to them, but our best long term situation is to allow > the people who have already registered to make use of that. What about people who've subscribed/posted to pgsql-advocacy/docs? All a new user would need to do is post an "I intend to write X" message - email gets slurped and account created. Gives somewhere to discuss new docs, point out existing stuff etc. > > Can we have moderation there for guests? We could notify back user that > > changes are accepted if he/she cares to leave an e-mail address there. > > Then we would have few truseted users and always welcome guests..;-) > > A feature that needs to be added is the ability for people to > "subscribe" to a page, so that whenever the page is changed it gets > emailed out to them. This is already possible, but will take about an > hour or so to read through the docs (have the right ones already marked) > then setup. It's important to get done before the new infrastructure is > announced to the general public. Two things I noted when I was thinking about this the other day: 1. A "diff" function for two versions of the same document 2. Some way of identifying docs that need updating when 7.3, 7.4, 8.0 come out. > As for a moderation/review process... preferably not. Am trying to > implement a way of doing things that makes things as easy as possible, > and in the PostgreSQL Community that will probably work. If however > page vandals routinely turn up we'll have to rethink it. Something fairly lightweight certainly. -- Richard Huxton
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: