Re: protocol change in 7.4
От | Satoshi Nagayasu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: protocol change in 7.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200211050605.gA565tD17709@penguin.bioinfo.sfc.keio.ac.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: protocol change in 7.4 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: protocol change in 7.4
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > I don't see why 2PC would require any protocol-level change. I would > think that the API would be something like > > BEGIN; > issue some commands ... > PRECOMMIT; > -- if the above does not return an error, then > COMMIT; > > In other words, 2PC would require some new commands, but a new command > doesn't affect the protocol layer. I think a precommit-vote-commit phase of 2PC can be implemented in command-lavel or protocol-level. In command-level 2PC, an user application (or application programmer) must know the DBMS is clustered or not (to use PRECOMMIT command). In protocol-layer 2PC, no new SQL command is required. A precommit-vote-commit phase will be called implicitly. It means an user application can be used without any modification. An application can use a traditional way (BEGIN...COMMIT). So I made my decision to use protocol-layer implementation. It doesn't affect the SQL command layer. -- NAGAYASU Satoshi <snaga@snaga.org>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: