Re: Low Budget Performance
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Low Budget Performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20021029151341.S25851@mail.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Low Budget Performance (eric soroos <eric-psql@soroos.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:43:33AM -0800, eric soroos wrote: > Is a scsi system that much better? Looking at prices, scsi is 1/2 > the capacity and double the price for the 80 gig 7200rpm ide vs 36 > gig 10k rpm scsi. Assuming that I'll never run out of space before > running out of performance, I can dedicate 2x the number of ide > drives to the problem. SCSI is dramatically better at using the interface. It is much smarter about, for instance, handling multiple disks at the same time; and it requires less attention from the CPU. That said, if you have enough high speed IDE controllers and disks, you'll probably beat an older SCSI system. And you can't beat the price/performance of IDE RAID. We use it for some applications. Note also that you get better RAID controllers from SCSI vendors, just because it's the official high speed offering. The Promise IDE RAID is nice, but it sure isn't as fast as the latest SCSI RAID controllers. (We have also found that there's some overhead in the IDE RAID. It was better under FreeBSD than I'm now experiencing under Linux. But that might just be my prejudices showing!) A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: