Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

Philip Warner wrote:
> 
> I just reread the patch; is it valid to assume fseek and fseeko have the 
> same  failure modes? Or does the call to 'fseek' actually call fseeko?

The fseek was a typo.  It should have been fseeko as you suggested.
CVS updated.

Your idea of using SEEK_SET is good, except I was concerned that the
checkSeek call will move the file pointer.  Is that OK?  It doesn't seem
appropriate.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073