Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200210240141.g9O1fjG24438@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner wrote: > At 10:42 AM 23/10/2002 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >What I am concerned about are cases that fail at runtime, specifically > >during a restore of a >2gig file. > > Please give an example that would still apply assuming we get a working > seek/tell pair that works with whatever we use as an offset? If we get this, everything is fine. I have done that for BSD/OS today. I may need to do the same for NetBSD/OpenBSD too. > If you are concerned about reading a dump file with 8 byte offsets on a > machine with 4 byte off_t, that case and it's permutations are already covered. No, I know that is covered because it will report a proper error message on the restore on the 4-byte off_t machine. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: