Re: Memory leaks
От | Karel Zak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Memory leaks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20021023081353.B19465@zf.jcu.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Memory leaks (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:28:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > I then moved on to psql, again, just for fun. Here, I'm thinking that I > > started to find some other leaks...but again, I've not spent any real > > time on it. So again, I'm not really sure it they are meaningful at > > this point. > > psql might well have some internal leaks; the backend memory-context > design doesn't apply to it. But why? In the Mape project is used mmgr based on PostgreSQL's mmgr andit's used for BE and FE. There is not problem withit (BTW backend ismultithread:-). IMHO use memory-context design for FE is good ideaif FE a lot works with memory. Ialready long time think about sharedlib with PostgreSQL mmgr... Karel -- Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: