Re: Postgresql and multithreading
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql and multithreading |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200210160525.g9G5POI05225@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql and multithreading (Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@lklug.pdn.ac.lk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Re: Postgresql and multithreading Re: Postgresql and multithreading |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:59:57AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > > > > > Is there any plans to make postgresql multithreading? > > > > We don't think it is needed, except perhaps for Win32 and Solaris, which > > have slow process creation times. > > Thanks, Bruce. But what I want to know is whether multithreading is > likely to get into in postgresql, say somewhere in 8.x, or even in 9.x? > (as they did with Apache). Are there any plans to do so, or is postgres > going to remain rather a multi-process application? It may be optional some day, most likely for Win32 at first, but we see little value to it on most other platforms; of course, we may be wrong. I am also not sure if it is a big win on Apache either; I think the jury is still out on that one, hence the slow adoption of 2.X, and we don't want to add threads and make a mess of the code or slow it down, which does often happen. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: