Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
От | Anuradha Ratnaweera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20021011103954.GA7338@lklug.pdn.ac.lk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
Ответы |
Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:04:29PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On 11 Oct 2002 at 16:29, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:54:15PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > I will look at it, too. Thanks for the link. In some cases, starting > > anew is faster than learning unmaintained existing code. Ok. Checked out what usogres is. It is not what I want. I don't want a static `main database'. It should simply a cluster of them - just like a set of Raid-0 disks, may be with a tempory controller for some tasks. Also, as a matter of fact, usogres is not unmaintained code. > While that's true, usogres code is just few files. I wouldn't take more than > half an hour to read up the things. And besides it contain postgresql protocol > implementation necessary which would take some time to test and debug, Great. I will look into this over the weekend. > And it's in C++. I like that..;-) And I DON'T like that ;) Anuradha -- Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.18-xfs-1.1) QOTD: "I ain't broke, but I'm badly bent."
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: