Re: [ADMIN] Multiple backends on a single physical database

Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:09:55AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Vincent Janelle wrote:
> > > No.  Only one postmaster can access the PGDATA dir at one time.
> > >  Attempting to run multiple copies will result in data corruption.
> >
> > We also don't recommend NFS directories because the NFS file behavior is
> > not 100% the same as a local file system.
>
> Obviously fsync(), WAL and NFS is not a good combination ;)
>
> As we are looking for possibilities to contribute to the postgresql
> code, I have couple of more questions.
>
> Is there any plans to,
> - Make postmaster a multithreaded application?

No, not really.  The multi-process model seems to work fine, and though
we can imagine cases where having more than one thread for a session
would help (like in sorting) we are not sure it is worth the added
complexity.  We already have other areas of easier optimization left to
improve.

> - Add more fault tolerence by better replication (yes.  I have already
>   looked at current replication efforts)?

Not really, just the replication projects and the multi-master
pgreplication at gborg.postgresql.org.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073