Re: [HACKERS] Advice: Where could I be of help?
От | Karel Zak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Advice: Where could I be of help? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20021007092417.D32143@zf.jcu.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Advice: Where could I be of help? (Thomas O'Dowd <tom@nooper.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:53:47PM +0900, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > > just an idea, but if you're still searching something to work on, you might want to take > > a look on the deadlock problem with foreign keys. It seems there's a new kind of lock needed here, > > because it's possible to deadlock backends where no real deadlock situation occurs. > > > > IMO this is one of the biggest problems in postgres now, because for foreign keys are widely used and > > - even if not deadlocking - performance is limited because of the many "select ... for update" the fk system > > uses limit concurrency to one at a time in many situations. > > That gets my vote too for what its worth... I had to remove most of the > FK references from my tables and just replaced them with triggers as the > amount of deadlocks I was getting in stress tests was killing me. <jog-to-developers> ... maybe try use latest MySQL with InnoDB tables :-) </jog-to-developers> Karel -- Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/ C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: