Re: [mike.aubury@aubit.com: PGconn ?]
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [mike.aubury@aubit.com: PGconn ?] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20021.1201853639@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [mike.aubury@aubit.com: PGconn ?] (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes: > From: Mike Aubury <mike.aubury@aubit.com> > Any chance of adding this (or something similar) for the next RC? > I don't like the idea of adding a feature albeit a very small one to 8.3 > at this point in time without even a small discussion. Mike explained to > me that he needs to access the PGconn structure of the current > connection. He used to get it by using an undocumented but exported > internal function in libecpg. However, with us cleaning up the namespace > this function now disappeared and I refused to reactivate it because it > only gave a pointer to an undocumented internal structure. However, the > approach he's proposing now (using the PGconn structure instead) works > inside the documented PGSQL framework and thus whould be fine. Is it > okay to add this to 8.3. now? Yes, I know, I need to add it to the > export list too. > In the long run I would like to implement whatever is missing in ecpg > and deprecate this function, but this isn't doable for 8.3. It's too late for 8.3 --- the tarball is already wrapped, and we won't consider a re-wrap short of some truly sickening bug report showing up in the next day or so. I'd suggest thinking in terms of a proper fix for 8.4. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: