Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200209292127.g8TLRw219816@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [SQL] arrays
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Bruce, > > > If we change CURRENT_TIMESTAMP to statement time, I don't think we need > > now(""), but if we don't change it, I think we do --- somehow we should > > allow users to access statement time. > > I'd argue that we need the 3 kinds of now() regardless, just to limit user > confusion. If we set things up as: > > now() = transaction time > current_timestamp = statement time > timeofday() = exact time > > That does give users access to all 3 timestamps, but using a competely > non-intuitive nomenclature. It's likely that the three types of now() would > just be pointers to other time functions, but would provide nomenative > clarity. I agree, having now() as a central place for time information is a good idea. Maybe we need to vote on these issues. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: