Re: additional patch for contrib/tablefunc - added to

Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> >>I think you finally got through my thick skull. Now I see the
> >>issue. OK, I'll  rework the patch using a timeout.
> >
> > I think this is unnecessary.  Bugs in any functionality tested by a
> > regression test could cause the system to go into an infinite loop;
> > but we don't put timeouts on all of them.  In practice we rely on
> > the user to exercise some judgment about whether the tests are
> > proceeding normally.
>
> Sounds good to me. I guess the patch stands as originally sent, unless other
> objections arise.

Uh, I already deleted it.  Can you shoot it to me again?  :-)

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073