Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel

Joe Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Uh, I thought you were changing connection_timeout, which is libpq and
> > not a GUC parameter
> 
> Yup, you're right -- I got myself confused. Sorry.
> 
> > not statement_timeout.  Do we want sub-second
> > timeout values?  Not sure.
> > 
> 
> I found it surprising that the statement_timeout was not in units of seconds, 
> but that's only because I read the docs after I tried it instead of before. I 
> can't think of a reason to have sub-second values, but it's probably not worth 
> changing it at this point.

Most queries are sub-second in duration so it seemed logical to keep it
the same as deadlock_timeout.  I can see someone setting a 1/2 second
delay for queries.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073