Re: Implementation of LIMIT on DELETE and UPDATE statements (rel to 7.2.1)

En Sun, 22 Sep 2002 01:19:24 +0200
srb@cuci.nl (Stephen R. van den Berg) escribió:

> Incidentally, using a SELECT without an ORDER BY but with a LIMIT is
> documented to give unpredictable results, yet users are expected cope with
> this fact, but are expected to have problems with a similar fact in
> an UPDATE or DELETE statement?
> Somehow the argumentation is not conclusive.

Yes, I was thinking the same thing when I answered earlier.

I am in the same position as you here (meaning someone who has
contributed some patch), so my opinion doesn't have a lot of weigth; but
as I already said, the feature has some value with the ORDER BY added,
and the LIMIT/OFFSET thing expanded to allow expressions (this last part
is in TODO).

Clearly an ORDER BY clause without LIMIT doesn't make any sense; but
it does with it.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"Para tener mas hay que desear menos"