Re: Conversion Questions
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Conversion Questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020921.093958.32743877.t-ishii@sra.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Conversion Questions (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Is there ever a need to have more than one conversion for a given > combination of encodings? Sure. For example, several Unicode and SJIS mappings exist depending on vendors or standards. M$ has its own, Apple has another one... If a user want to employ Apple's map, he could define his own implicit conversion. > And if I have more than one combination > registered, which one is used by the implicit server/client conversion? That depends on current name space. You could find such an example in the conversion regression test. Note that you cannot define more than one implicit conversion for a schema/server encoding/client encoding combination. > Also, if my server encoding is A and my client encoding is B, and I do > > SELECT convert('some string' using a_to_c); -- not B > > or even > > SELECT convert('some string' using e_to_f); > > this would surely lead to bogus results? Yes. Choosing right conversion is callers responsibilty. > What's the use of all this? One example. A user wants to apply lower() to Unicode database. select convert(lower(convert('X' using utf_8_to_iso_8859_1)) using iso_8859_1_to_utf_8); -- Tatsuo Ishii
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: