Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > We are going to require an initdb for beta2 and I think we need to get
> > _everything_ required in there before going to beta2.  See the open
> > items list.  I think we will need until the middle of next week for
> > beta2.  In fact, I have the inheritance patch that will require an
> > initdb and that isn't even applied yet;  Friday is too early.
> 
> We are in beta, not release ... the purpose of going to beta2 is to
> provide a new checkpoint to work bug reports off of, so having to deal
> with an initdb should not be considered a problem by anyone, since only a
> fool would run beta in production, no? (and ya, I am such a fool at times,
> but i do accept the fact that I am such *grin*)

We should get _all_ the known initdb-related issues into the code before
we go beta2 or beta3 is going to require another initdb.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073