Re: Inconsistent Conversion Names
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inconsistent Conversion Names |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020919.145712.27799802.t-ishii@sra.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Inconsistent Conversion Names (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inconsistent Conversion Names
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I thought you had named the conversion functions after the IANA names. I > found the following inconsistencies, however: > > sjis should be shift_jis The conversion named "SJIS" is different from IANA's "shift_jis". It actually matches "Windows-31J" in IANA, which is too ugly to being emploied as our conversion name, IMO. > win1250 should be windows_1250 (similarly 866, 1251) I agree with win1250 -> windows_1250, win1251 -> windows_1251, but do not agree with renaming win866. There's no windows_866 in IANA. Maybe that should be "ibm866"? > koi8r should be koi8_r Someone said that the conversion table is actually koi8r + koi8u, being different from IANA's koi8_r. Not sure though. -- Tatsuo Ishii
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: