Re: Index usage on date feild , differences in '>' and '>='
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index usage on date feild , differences in '>' and '>=' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020918233621.A23870-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Index usage on date feild , differences in '>' and '>=' and between ("Rajesh Kumar Mallah." <mallah@trade-india.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index usage on date feild , differences in '>' and '>=' and between
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Rajesh Kumar Mallah. wrote: > I am trying to improve a query to use existing indexes but facing diffculty. > > > Looks like 'between' amd '>=' are not using indexes althoug > and < does. > all my application code uses between and i am sure it use to work fine > at one point of time. > > > regds > mallah. > > SQL TRANSCRIPT: > ====================================================================================== > > tradein_clients=> explain select list_id from eyp_rfi a where generated > '2002-08-13' and generated < '2002-09-19' ; > NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: > > Index Scan using eyp_rfi_date on eyp_rfi a (cost=0.00..15796.97 rows=4150 width=4) > > EXPLAIN > tradein_clients=> explain select list_id from eyp_rfi a where generated >= '2002-08-13' and generated < '2002-09-19' ; > NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: > > Seq Scan on eyp_rfi a (cost=0.00..17923.81 rows=5061 width=4) Given how close the two results are (and the fact that they differ by 900 rows), have you tried using set enable_seqscan=off and seeing what explain gives you for the second query? My guess is that it'll have an estimated cost greater than the 17923.81 it's estimating from the sequence scan.
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: