Re: PostgreSQL+ (Beta) and Active Server Pages with @TRANSACTION=REQUIRED
| От | Chris Gamache |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL+ (Beta) and Active Server Pages with @TRANSACTION=REQUIRED |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20020912164441.96976.qmail@web13804.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL+ (Beta) and Active Server Pages with (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
| Список | pgsql-odbc |
Perhaps, but the MS Access ODBC Driver would run in an MTS transaction, even though there is no transaction support in access. I use ODBC like I drive my car. I put in the key, turn it, and it just works. What could I do to get under the hood and find out what this mysterious "Set" thing might require to function properly? I don't care to even have the PostgreSQL transaction auto-roll-back when the MTS Transaction fails. I need the transaction support for the larger operation of which the database transactions are a small part. CG --- Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> wrote: > > Maybe MTS requires Distributed transaction support but > PostgreSQL(and of cource psqlodbc driver) doesn't support it. > I'm not sure if MTS provides the option to work with non- > distributed system. > > regards, > Hiroshi Inoue > http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: