Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200209121604.g8CG43J02210@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
scott.marlowe wrote: > > Seems like the NT4 users are left out in the cold though until we add > > some kind of ability for PostgreSQL to not look at the filesystem for > > info about where to put the xlog files. > > This isn't true. With the resource kit, you get the gnu utils, and ln > works a charm under NT4 with ntfs. And not just for directories, but > files as well. Unless Microsoft somehow removed that functionality in the > intervening years since I've used NT. (wouldn't put it past them, but I > doubt they have.) Yes, this is what I remember, that Cygwin had symlinks, and at that time that was the only Win32 OS we supported. Now, with native Win32 port coming, we have to figure out what is available. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: