Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200209101830.g8AIUL908840@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > I am continuing to talk to Henry about getting a newer version of his > > regex library. He is working on it but is not yet finished. > > Do you have some details about the implementation itself? I would like > to work on implementing a regex engine using the Shift-And algorithm > families, and that can probably give a performance improvement over the > current engine. [ CC'ing Henry Spencer. ] No, I don't know any details except that his regex library is in the new tcl code and has to repackaged as a separate library. Henry, could we help you finish up your regex stuff? Henry's regex work is the same code that is in *BSD regex (at least BSD/OS, FreeBSD, NetBSD), which I have found to be pretty slow in certain complex cases, so much so that I have moved to super-sed (ssed) for use on my local machine where I have seen 100x speed improvements with ssed. I am not sure how slow our regex really is, but for the sake of PostgreSQL and of the BSD regex library, I would love to see a newer version. In fact, I just had an email exchange with Henry about two weeks ago. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: