Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200209100213.g8A2DKu03363@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue (Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Steve Howe wrote: > Because the affected commands are supposed to give you back > information on what your INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE commands, not what is > making behind the scenes. > > And it seems that other people in the thread agree with me, please > read thread. > > Since you are probably very familiar with the rules system, why don't > you vote on a proposal too, or just suggest yours. Your opinion is > very important. I'm not saying I'm the truth owner; I'm just another > developer who needs a feature working again. Jan actually did vote in the first round which appears in TODO.detail. He voted that if the INSTEAD rule had only _one_ statement, return that, if not, return nothing. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: