Re: fsync or fdatasync
От | Ragnar Kjørstad |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fsync or fdatasync |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020910015207.U24188@vestdata.no обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fsync or fdatasync (Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: fsync or fdatasync
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 04:43:04PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > We'll be glad to consider changing the default for a specific platform > > if we have a reasonably convincing argument that the other value is > > better. So far, not much study has been done of which method is best > > on which platforms (and under what load conditions). > > heh, just a quick note: I had one of FreeBSD's kernel guru's point out > that fsync() on linux is a no-op. I haven't had that src tree in > years so I can't confirm, but I'm inclined to believe him. Just an No, fsync() is not a no-op on linux. Unless the filesystem is mounted with o_sync, I suppose - then everything is written at write() so fsync() is not needed. But generally, it does sync. -- Ragnar Kjørstad Big Storage
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: