Re: beta1 packaged

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > Hrmm ... that is odd, now that you mention it ... but the file
> > 'distributions' between v7.2 and v7.3beta appear to be the same, so -base-
> > was broken in the old one too?
> 
> It was never intended that the "base" tarfile was alone sufficient to do
> anything, was it?

OK, so if base isn't compilable, then what is it good for?  I don't see
any add-on packages that would make it usable.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073