Re: Proposed GUC Variable
От | Ross J. Reedstrom |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed GUC Variable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020827223004.GA20278@rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposed GUC Variable (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposed GUC Variable
Re: Proposed GUC Variable |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:08:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > But we should have some default to print some of the query, > > Why? So far you've been told by two different people (make that three > now) that such a behavior is useless, and no one's weighed in in its > favor ... I agree that a 'trimmed' query is likely to be useless, but the idea of printing the query on ERROR is a big win for me: right now I'm logging _all_ queries on our development machine (and sometimes on our production machine. when there's trouble) so my logs would get considerably smaller. A settable trim length would probably be a good idea, I suppose, for those slinging 'bytea' and toasted texts around. Ross
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: