Dave Cramer wrote:
> Barry,
>
> I think notionally the idea would be to call a stored proc which
> returned a cursor, and when result set's supported cursors this would be
> feasible. I'm still not sure how we tell if the stored proc returned a
> cursor?
The function is defined as returning a REFCURSOR, right?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073