Re: bison news
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bison news |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200208202117.g7KLHkX05185@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bison news (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: bison news
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > OK, now that _a_ bison exists that works, how does this effect our > > release? I don't see preproc.[ch] in CVS. Do we need this new bison > > version on postgresql.org because Marc generates these as part of his > > install script? > > I don't think we want a beta bison on postgres.org. Let's see if we can > hold out for a release... Well, we had better get it on or it will get zero testing, and we _need_ it for the 7.3 release of ecpg, because as I remember, we didn't have any other good backup plans. ;-) This may be a case where we have to do some beta testing on our own. I will grab the bison beta myself for my machine. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: