Re: full table...
От | Felson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: full table... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020820171202.31129.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: full table... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Thanks for all your help Tom. Turns out this thread really did belong on the "novice" list... It turns out that I hadent vacumed the to tables that this one was pointing at... After I vaccumed the other 2 tables, I get about one 7 insert sample every 2-3 seconds, and that includes the time it takes the unit to send me the data over CDPD... Man am I glad I posted before I tried my fix! That would have been a pain in the !@*&^ to administer... --- Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Felson <felson123@yahoo.com> writes: > > I am on 7.0 I am plaing an upgade at the end of > the > > week as I am getting a new server to put it on. As > for > > rules, there are a number of indexs, and 2 forign > key > > rules. > > Ah-hah. I bet your problem is the foreign key > rules. Make sure you > have indexes on both ends of each foreign-key > reference (ie, both the > referencing and referenced columns need indexes). > Also, vacuum analyze > both tables. Then start a fresh backend and see if > it's any better. > (You need a fresh backend because the plans for > foreign-key check > queries are cached.) > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the > unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: