Re: improve SET CONSTRAINTS

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

    http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Neil Conway wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
> > Also, don't we run the trigger queue after each statement anyway? So why
> > does it need to be run by SET CONSTRAINTS explicitly?
>
> I've been pulling my hair out regarding this since Stephen pointed it
> out earlier on -patches. Although I could have *sworn* I had a
> test-case in which we did the wrong thing, I can't seem to find one
> now :-)
>
> Sorry for the spam -- AFAICT we did the right thing originally. I've
> attached a revised patch that just includes the documentation
> improvements, code cleanup, and regression tests.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073