Re: CLUSTER all tables at once?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CLUSTER all tables at once? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200208141740.g7EHeXR13271@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CLUSTER all tables at once? ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Sounds good to me. TODO updated: o Cluster all tables at once using pg_index.indisclustered set during previous CLUSTER --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote: > > > Added to TODO: > > > > o Cluster all tables at once using pg_index.indisclustered or primary key > > > > > > And what happens with those tables that do not have any such index? > > > > > > Nothing, would be my vote. You'd just re-CLUSTER all tables that have > > > been clustered before, the same way they were last clustered. > > I second Tom's opinion. If the table was not clustered before leave it as is. > > Thus the TODO should imho (if at all :-) read: > o Cluster all tables at once that have a pg_index.indisclustered > > Andreas > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: