Re: Sourceforge moving to DB2
От | Tommi Maekitalo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sourceforge moving to DB2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200208141413.55170.t.maekitalo@epgmbh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sourceforge moving to DB2 (Gregory Seidman <gss+pg@cs.brown.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sourceforge moving to DB2
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, Am Dienstag, 13. August 2002 18:19 schrieb Gregory Seidman: ... > > The advantage of PostgreSQL over DB2 is cost, and little else (you can > claim the community support is better, and you're probably right, but DB2 > has commercial support). The advantages of DB2 over PostgreSQL are numerous > and varied, including performance, SQL compliance, SQL extensions, > first-class optimized ODBC and JDBC drivers, etc. They are comparable in > ease of installation and use (I've installed, administered, and used both > on various platforms), and DB2's administration tools are better. > ... > > } Vince. > --Greg > There are other (less technical) points. The licence of PostgreSQL allowes to extend your service without asking some IBM or someone else for additional licences. It is just convenient. And if you have problems and probably can solve it for yourself: in PostgreSQL you are allowed to fix it. Another point is the future. If you would like to try out the new AMD-Hammer for example, you can recompile PostgreSQL for yourself. But if IBM chooses not to support your future platform, you are lost. The other side is responsiblity. If you choose DB2 IBM is responsable for it. What if some day your data get corrupted? IBM will help you (for money of course, but they must). On PostgreSQL you are more or less on your own. There is no so strong commercial support. These points do not belong just to Sourceforge, but these are arguments for choosing one database or the other. Tommi
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: