Re: contrib/ buffer paranoia
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib/ buffer paranoia |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200208140542.g7E5g2O02303@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: contrib/ buffer paranoia (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Conway wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com> writes: > > Neil Conway dijo: > > > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com> writes: > > > > I think in dbase/dbf2pg.c the limit of 10 to pgdate should be 11 > > > > (snprintf counts the \0 at the end). > > > > > > Yes, but so does the array declaration itself: a char[10] can hold at > > > most 9 characters plus the '\0' terminator. I think the original code > > > is buggy: if the author wants to store 10 characters plus a terminator > > > in the array, it should be declared as a char[11]. Using snprintf() of > > > length 11 with a char[10] would allow for a one-character overrun. > > > > I agree. Maybe it worked out of pure luck (or some alignment magic). > > But while you're at it, you can as well correct the bug. > > Ok, a revised patch is attached that fixes the off-by-one bug in > dbase/dbf2pg.c > > Thanks for the code review. > > Cheers, > > Neil > > -- > Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> > PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: